Macedonian Struggle for Independence
Part 6 - Uprisings Against Byzantine Rule
By Risto Stefov
rstefov@hotmail.com
June 2008
Website: www.Oshchima.com
[click
here for atricles on the Macedonian Struggle]
After losing their independence to the Byzantines,
the situation for the Macedonian people during the 11th century
worsened. First it was the taxes levied that most people could
not afford. Then there were the invasions by the Pechenegs, Uzis
and Kumans who overran Macedonian territories robbing and pillaging.
The Vlachs living in the mountains also took to the plains and
did their deeds of robbing and pillaging. After that natural disasters
followed. Severe earthquakes in 1026, 1037 and 1039 almost destroyed
Macedonia. After the earthquakes came severe droughts causing rivers
and springs to dry up. Later came pestilences; clouds of grasshoppers
devastated the landscape. After that hail began to fall destroying
whatever food remained causing unprecedented hunger resulting in
epidemics. According to Scyilitzes, in 1040 many people died in
Macedonia, so many in fact that the living could not bury them
all. (Vanche Stojchev. "Military History of Macedonia".
Military academy. Skopje, 2004. Page 84)
With all that was going on the people in Macedonia and the
surrounding Balkans had just about had enough and began fighting
back. Naturally they could do nothing against nature so they
took their anger out on their occupiers and oppressors by
rebelling against them.
Leading the rebellion was Peter Delyan, (Tsar Samoil's grandson)
Gabriel Radomir's son by his first wife, the daughter of
the Hungarian king. The rebellion, supported by the Hungarian
king, began in the regions of Belgrade and Morava near the
Hungarian border and soon spread south to Skopje. With popular
support and assistance from the local Macedonian population,
the rebel army invaded and took Skopje. Constantinople quickly
reacted by dispatching an army in pursuit. But instead of
attacking, the Byzantine soldiers defected and proclaimed
Tihomir, one of their own soldiers, as their emperor. Tihomir
unfortunately died in battle leaving his army under Delyan's
command.
Delyan began a military campaign to recover his grandfather's
kingdom. He started by sending troops to Dyrrachium and,
with the support of the local people, managed to take that
theme. He then sent a large army to besiege Solun. At the
sight of Delyan's immense army, Emperor Michael IV, who at
the time was waiting for him, fled in terror to Constantinople
leaving Manuel Ivets in command of the Byzantine army. But
instead of fighting, Ivets defected to Delyan's side, joining
forces with the rebels.
Exploiting the panic which had risen in the ranks of the
Byzantine army, Delyan dispatched armies in several directions.
One, led by Anthimus, made its way south reaching as deep
as the town Tiva spreading the revolt into Epirus and conquering
the theme of Naupactos. Another army took Demetrias (Volos
in Thessaly) and so on. Soon Delyan was in possession of
a large territory encompassing the greater part of Samoil's
kingdom.
Dissatisfied with the situation in Macedonia, the higher
echelons of Constantinople demanded that the Emperor do something.
Not to disappoint them, the Emperor prepared for war and
set out to meet Delyan in Macedonia. Unfortunately Delyan
was not the emperor's only problem. Aleutian, John Vladislav's
second son who was a patrician and commander of Theodosiopolis
in Armenia, had also joined the rebellion. Delyan not only
accepted Aleutian's services, but also made him commander
of his army of forty thousand soldiers and dispatched him
to Solun.
Unbeknownst to Aleutian, however, the Byzantine army stationed
in Solun must have been aware of his plans and surprised
him. A battle ensued and Aleutian lost about fifteen thousand
men. His defeat led to discord in the ranks of the rebels
and Aleutian was suspected of treason. Suspicion turned to
tragedy when Aleutian turned against Delyan, blinding him
in a fit of rage. He then fled to the Byzantines. Stripped
of their leaders, the rebels were thrown into confusion and
the insurrection was condemned to fail.
In the spring of 1041 the Byzantine Emperor again prepared
for war and set out for Ostrovo, the center of the revolt.
There he captured Delyan and sent him to Solun. From Ostrovo
the Emperor set out for the interior of Macedonia and met
up with Manual Ivets in Prilep. Ivets and his troops fought
bravely but they were no match for the Byzantines. Ivets
was captured and the rebellion was extinguished. After his
successful campaign, the Byzantine Emperor triumphantly returned
to Constantinople with Delyan and Ivets as his trophies.
Instead of bringing change for the better, the rebellion
brought disaster to the Macedonian people. The Byzantine
army, which consisted mainly of Norwegian mercenaries under
the command of Harold Hardraga, devastated Macedonia. They
enslaved most of the population and brought new state officials
and feudal lords who, together with the army, introduced
even more oppressive measures.
Unable to cope, the people rose again, this time in Thessaly.
In 1066 the Vlach population in Thessaly rebelled under the
leadership of Nikulitsa Delphin, the Governor of Larissa,
whose grandfather had governed the town during Samuel's reign.
Even though the rebellion was entrusted to Nikulitsa, a descendent
of rebels, he personally had no interest in a successful
outcome. As a result, the revolt did not succeed in spreading
as well as it could have and only extended to the towns of
Larissa, Trikkala, Pharsala and the fortress of Cythros.
The Byzantine Emperor Constantine X was quick to react and
stopped the rebellion from spreading into the interior of
Macedonia. Then, even before the year was over, with Nikulitsa's
help, Constantine successfully put down the rest of the rebellion.
In 1072, five years after the Thessalian rebellion, a new
revolt broke out, this time inside Macedonia. The revolt,
led by George Voyteh, took place in Skopje and was sparked
by new and more oppressive financial policies introduced
by the Byzantine authorities. The leaders of the revolt turned
for help to Michael, the ruler of Zeta, who was related to
Samoil. Michael sent his son Constantine Bodin along with
three hundred of his elite troops. Voyteh and his rebels
met Bodin at Prizren and immediately proclaimed him emperor
under the name Peter, in honour of the fallen Peter Delyan.
On receiving news that the rebels were headed for Skopje,
the former and current Byzantine governors of that city,
along with their armies, came out to stop them. A battle
ensued at Prizren and the Byzantines were defeated. After
taking the governor of Skopje prisoner, Bodin divided his
army in two columns. One column he dispatched to Naissus
while the second column, with Petrilo in command, he sent
into the interior of Macedonia. Voyteh remained in Skopje.
Petrilo's first stop was Ohrid where he was greeted by the
town's people as a liberator. When Devol, the Byzantine governor,
saw him coming he surrendered without a struggle. While the
town's people were running out to greet the rebel army, the
feudal lords, administrators and Byzantine soldiers slipped
out the back and fled to the fortified town of Kostur. There
they convinced the Kostur governor to organize a strong defense.
When Petrilo arrived he was met with strong resistance and
a battle ensued. Combined, the Byzantine, Ohrid and Kostur
armies inflicted great damage on the insurgents. Petrilo
just barely managed to escape and fled to Zeta.
Bodin was a little more successful and drove the Byzantines
out of Naissus. However, hearing of Petrilo's defeat in Kostur
deflated his enthusiasm.
By now the main Byzantine army, led by Michael Saronit,
was closing in on Skopje and the mere sight of its enormity
frightened Voyteh. Outnumbered, Voyteh agreed to surrender
Skopje without a fight but secretly he sent for Bodin to
come to his rescue. Unfortunately once again the Byzantine
spies did their job and Saronit set a trap for Bodin. Bodin's
army was intercepted and defeated at Kossovo Polye. Bodin
was captured and sent to Constantinople, along with Voyteh,
as Saronit's prisoner. Voyteh unfortunately died on the way,
probably from torture. Initially Bodin was imprisoned in
Constantinople but later, at the intervention of Venetian
mercenaries, he was returned to Zeta.
In 1073 the Byzantines stepped up their campaign in Macedonia
and brought additional forces in to rout the remaining pockets
of rebel resistance. Unfortunately that was not all that
they did. In pursuit of the rebels the Byzantine army destroyed
Samoil's imperial palace in Prespa and looted the churches
in the vicinity. These acts further inflamed the situation
and the rebels continued to resist, forcing the Byzantines
to bring even more troops and take more drastic measures.
Only by burning and razing everything, wherever opposition
was offered, did the Byzantines succeed in putting down the
rebellion. By the end of 1073 it was all over.
When all else failed the oppressed masses began to express
their frustration by joining the Bogomil movement. They became
particularly powerful at the end of the eleventh century
and even more so during the course of the twelfth century.
The struggle of the Bogomils was directed as equally against
the feudal lords as it was against the Byzantine Emperor
and his spiritual and ecclesiastical officials.
The Byzantine appointed Archbishop, Theophylact of Ohrid,
waged a fierce war against the Bogomils of Ohrid yet, in
spite of severe punishment, he did not succeed in stamping
them out. Led by the priest Basil, the Bogomil apostles and
women preachers spread Bogomilism throughout all the regions
of the empire, even into Constantinople itself.
Confronted with this rapid spread of Bogomilism, the Byzantine
Emperor Alexius I Comnenus decided to personally intervene.
While making plans to eradicate the Bogomils he figured it
was a good time to also attack the Paulician movement which
existed on a large scale in the Balkans. His soldiers rounded
up all the Bogomils they could catch, including their leader
Basil, and brought them before a Synod in Constantinople.
The Synod quickly condemned them to death and subsequently
had them executed. The movements did not collapse as expected,
however, but rather experienced a revival after Alexius I
Comnenus's death in 1118.
During the 1070's, while Michael VII Parapinakes was emperor,
many enemies began to descend upon Byzantine territory. The
new enemies that appeared at this time seemed to emerge almost
simultaneously on the northern, eastern and western frontiers.
It was nothing new for the Byzantines to have to fight on
multiple fronts simultaneously but that task required a soldier
on the throne.
The Pechenegs, a Turkic tribe, had long been a northern
neighbour and valuable ally against the Bulgars, Magyars
and Russians. After the Bulgar Empire collapsed the Pechenegs
began to raid across the Danube into Byzantine territory.
As allies, Constantine IX allowed them to settle south of
the river but by mid-11th century they were becoming a nuisance.
They were threatening Thrace and Macedonia and encouraging
the spirit of revolt among the Bogomils. Alexius I put their
reign of terror to an end in1091.
The next to arrive, this time on the eastern frontier, were
the Seljuq Turks, whose conquests would change the shape
of both the Muslim and Byzantine worlds. In 1055, having
conquered Persia, they entered Baghdad and their prince assumed
the title of sultan and protector of the Abbasid caliphate.
Before long they asserted their authority up to the borders
of Fatimid Egypt and through Byzantine Anatolia. They made
their first appearance across the Byzantine frontier in Armenia
in the mid 1060's and went as far west as Caesarea in central
Anatolia.
The appearance of the Turkish raiders frightened the military
aristocracy in Anatolia who, in 1068, elected one of their
own emperors, Romanus IV Diogenes. Romanus assembled an army
consisting mainly of foreign mercenaries and went on a campaign
against the Turks. In August 1071 the Byzantines lost the
battle at Manzikert, near Lake Van in Armenia. Romanus was
taken prisoner by the Seljuq sultan, Alp-Arslan. After signing
a treaty with the sultan, Romanus was allowed to buy his
freedom. Unfortunately Constantinople did not want him back
and installed their candidate Michael VII. Subsequently Romanus's
treaty with the Turks was rejected and Romanus himself was
treacherously blinded. With their treaty rejected, the Seljuqs
were justified in resuming their raids.
It did not take too long before an irreconcilable rift began
to form between Constantinople and the eastern themes. Civil
war broke out consuming all resources and leaving no troops
to defend the eastern frontier. The Turks were quick to exploit
the situation and by 1081 had penetrated Asia Minor and taken
Nicaea. The heart of the empire's military and economic strength
was now in Turkish hands.
The next enemy, the Normans, arrived from the west and began
their conquest of southern Italy early in the 11th century.
Ironically the Norman conquests were made possible by Basil
II's project of recovering Sicily from the Arabs. Sicily
was almost recovered in 1042 by the great general of the
post-Macedonian era, George Maniaces. Unfortunately, being
fearful of him and his military reputation, Constantine IX
had him recalled and killed as a pretender to the throne.
The Normans afterwards simply filled the political void and
made steady progress conquering Italy.
In 1071 after a three-year siege, the Normans, led by Robert
Guiscard, finally took Bari, the last remaining Byzantine
stronghold in the west. After that Byzantine rule in Italy
and the hope of re-conquering Sicily came to an end.
The simultaneous losses of Manzikert, to the Turks in the
east, and Bari, to the Normans in the west were a disaster
for the Byzantines. The final loss of Italy put a permanent
physical barrier between the Byzantine east and the Latin
west.
After conquering Bari, the Normans pressed on with their
campaign into Byzantine territory. In 1072 they won a resounding
victory in Dyrrachium and in the following year another in
Ioannina. Then they turned to Macedonia and took Ohrid, the
two Pologs and Skopje. After that they made their way to
Berroea and Meglen and rebuilt the destroyed fortress. The
Normans then followed the Vardar River and camped for three
months in Beli Tsrkvi. Following their long rest they came
back and took Pelagonia, Trikkala and Kostur. In January
1084, in an attempt to take Larissa, they suffered a devastating
defeat. A year later Emperor Alexius I, making use of his
victory, attacked and took back Kostur, forcing the Normans
to retreat from the Balkans.
The Norman conquests had serious long term consequences
for Macedonia. Outside of the Norman mayhem and looting,
the Macedonians were once again subjected to new cruelties
as the Byzantines returned and imposed law and order on the
province.
The Norman expulsion unfortunately did not bring peace to
Macedonia. As mentioned earlier, Bodin succeeded his father
to the throne of Zeta in 1081 and immediately began campaigning
in Byzantine territory. He seized Mokra, a part of the Ohrid
district including Mt. Bagora, and then proceeded to take
the district of Dyrrachium. At that time the Byzantine Emperor,
Alexius I Comnenus, intervened and Bodin was forced to retreat.
Later, from time to time, Bodin took the occasion to campaign
in the Ohrid region but always withdrew at the presence of
the Byzantine army.
Towards the end of the 1090's Vukan, the ruler of Rashka,
decided to invade Macedonia and attack Skopje. Vukan's presence
in Byzantine territory provoked a counterattack from the
Emperor who this time personally took charge of the mission.
Comnenus undertook three campaigns against Rashka in 1091,
1093 and 1094. His personal intervention not only gave the
Byzantines an opportunity to take back all of Macedonia,
but also sent a clear message to Bodin to keep out.
Even with all of Macedonia's possessions under Byzantine
control, the empire could not replenish the military and
economic resources it lost as a result of losing Asia Minor
to the Turks. Its shrinking boundaries reduced the once mighty
empire from the status of a world power to that of a small
state fighting for survival. The loss of Anatolia forced
the Byzantines to turn away from the east and start looking
to the west.
The first sign of this westward interest was in 1082 after
the Normans captured Dyrrachium and were about to advance
overland to Solun. Alexius, the Byzantine emperor, having
no resources to raise a sizable army, called on the Venetians
to help him.
To be continued
----------
You can contact the author at rstefov@hotmail.com

Top
|